After that qualifying phase 16 teams that have not directly qualified for EURO 2020, will have another chance to gain one of the last 4 qualifying berths for EURO 2020 via play-offs, to be played in March 2020. The 16 eligible teams and match-ups are determined in a somewhat complex procedure, but that procedure is also based on the overall UNL-ranking.
Teams will be ordered in this UNL-ranking by:
- league
- position in the group
- points
- goal-difference
- goals scored
- away goals scored
- number of wins
- number of away wins
- fair-play
- UEFA NT-coefficient
Notes:
- ordering of the group winners in league A will be decided in the Final Four in June 2019;
- in league C the ranking of the group numbers 1 to 3 will be based on the group matches against numbers 1 to 3 in the group; the ranking of the group numbers 4 will be based on all group matches.
Here are the probabilities (in %) for each team to end in each pot -generated over 10.000 simulations- with teams ordered by their average UNL-ranking position.
team | pot 1 | pot 2 | pot 3 | pot 4 | pot 5 | pot 6 |
Belgium | 98,15 | 1,85 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
France | 96,38 | 3,62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Portugal | 92,59 | 7,41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Spain | 91,36 | 8,64 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Italy | 88,54 | 11,46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Croatia | 85,63 | 14,37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Switzerland | 86,69 | 13,31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Germany | 81,32 | 18,68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
England | 81,12 | 18,88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Netherlands | 71,84 | 28,16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Poland | 72,83 | 27,17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Iceland | 53,55 | 46,45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sweden | 0 | 83,16 | 16,84 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Denmark | 0 | 82,48 | 17,52 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Austria | 0 | 72,64 | 27,36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bosnia-Herzegovina | 0 | 70,97 | 29,03 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Slovakia | 0 | 69,95 | 30,05 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ukraine | 0 | 67,96 | 32,04 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wales | 0 | 63,42 | 36,58 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Czech Republic | 0 | 62,09 | 37,91 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Turkey | 0 | 58,61 | 41,39 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Northern Ireland | 0 | 56,39 | 43,61 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Russia | 0 | 58,23 | 41,77 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Republic of Ireland | 0 | 54,10 | 45,90 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Scotland | 0 | 0 | 74,25 | 25,75 | 0 | 0 |
Serbia | 0 | 0 | 65,78 | 34,22 | 0 | 0 |
Romania | 0 | 0 | 54,37 | 45,63 | 0 | 0 |
Norway | 0 | 0 | 49,76 | 50,24 | 0 | 0 |
Greece | 0 | 0 | 49,99 | 50,01 | 0 | 0 |
Slovenia | 0 | 0 | 46,30 | 53,70 | 0 | 0 |
Albania | 0 | 0 | 41,80 | 58,20 | 0 | 0 |
Bulgaria | 0 | 0 | 43,18 | 56,82 | 0 | 0 |
Finland | 0 | 0 | 41,71 | 58,29 | 0 | 0 |
Israel | 0 | 0 | 34,99 | 65,01 | 0 | 0 |
Hungary | 0 | 0 | 35,66 | 64,34 | 0 | 0 |
Montenegro | 0 | 0 | 26,76 | 73,24 | 0 | 0 |
Estonia | 0 | 0 | 20,37 | 79,63 | 0 | 0 |
Cyprus | 0 | 0 | 10,63 | 89,37 | 0 | 0 |
Lithuania | 0 | 0 | 4,45 | 95,55 | 0 | 0 |
Belarus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23,70 | 75,29 | 1,01 |
FYR Macedonia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21,06 | 76,51 | 2,43 |
Georgia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14,34 | 81,88 | 3,78 |
Armenia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11,80 | 83,22 | 4,98 |
Kosovo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6,26 | 81,26 | 12,48 |
Luxembourg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,81 | 87,29 | 7,90 |
Azerbaijan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,85 | 77,43 | 17,72 |
Moldova | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,20 | 86,54 | 9,26 |
Kazakhstan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,13 | 81,82 | 14,05 |
Latvia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,96 | 79,71 | 17,33 |
Faroe Islands | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,25 | 63,84 | 34,91 |
Malta | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,36 | 43,40 | 56,24 |
Liechtenstein | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,20 | 37,68 | 62,12 |
Gibraltar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,05 | 27,24 | 72,71 |
Andorra | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,03 | 14,00 | 85,97 |
San Marino | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,00 | 2,89 | 97,11 |
And the seeding pots with teams ordered by their average UNL-ranking position. The leagues are indicated by the dotted lines.
pot 1
Belgium | 3,62 |
France | 4,03 |
Portugal | 5,44 |
Spain | 5,55 |
Italy | 6,34 |
Croatia | 6,61 |
Switzerland | 6,66 |
Germany | 7,05 |
England | 7,16 |
Netherlands | 8,04 |
pot 2
Poland | 8,07 |
Iceland | 9,43 |
----------------------------------------- | |
Sweden | 16,82 |
Denmark | 16,86 |
Austria | 18,06 |
Bosnia-Herzegovina | 18,12 |
Slovakia | 18,24 |
Ukraine | 18,33 |
Wales | 18,91 |
Czech Republic | 18,95 |
pot 3
Turkey | 19,30 |
Northern Ireland | 19,32 |
Russia | 19,38 |
Republic of Ireland | 19,72 |
----------------------------------------- | |
Scotland | 28,45 |
Serbia | 29,38 |
Romania | 30,39 |
Norway | 30,90 |
Greece | 30,92 |
Slovenia | 31,25 |
pot 4
Albania | 31,25 |
Bulgaria | 31,50 |
Finland | 31,71 |
Israel | 31,81 |
Hungary | 32,38 |
Montenegro | 33,00 |
Estonia | 34,30 |
Cyprus | 35,76 |
Lithuania | 36,98 |
----------------------------------------- | |
Belarus | 43,03 |
pot 5
FYR Macedonia | 43,24 |
Georgia | 44,01 |
Armenia | 44,37 |
Kosovo | 45,54 |
Luxembourg | 46,12 |
Azerbaijan | 46,27 |
Moldova | 46,40 |
Kazakhstan | 46,42 |
Latvia | 46,93 |
Faroe Islands | 48,34 |
pot 6
Malta | 50,16 |
Liechtenstein | 50,80 |
Gibraltar | 51,54 |
Andorra | 52,69 |
San Marino | 54,15 |
About me:
Software engineer, happily unmarried and non-religious. You won't find me on Twitter or other so called social media. Dutchman, joined the blog in March 2018.
When will be update after 2 Matchdays?
ReplyDeleteI love this website. It's so informative.
ReplyDeleteAm I correct in saying that for League B, the 4 teams that finish bottom of their groups will be 3rd seeds & the teams that finish top 2 will be 2nd seeds?
Thanks.
Quite right, Hawk. And thanks for your kind words.
DeleteThat's great thanks. It's taken me a long time to get my head around the Structure of the UEFA Nations, but I really like the format.
DeleteApologies if this is a stupid question but something with the Nations League has been on my mind lately and this is the best place I can think to ask.
ReplyDeleteIs there any advantage to being in a 4 team group or a 3 team group in League C? Something in the back of my head says, even though the results against the 4th team are removed it doesn't completely balance things out, but I can't think why anyone would gain this hypothetical advantage. Something to do with the 4th seeds in the four team groups not necessarily finishing bottom and this changing things in some way.
I could be talking complete rubbish but have you ever noticed anything in the probabilities showing an advantage one way or another in the rankings?
Thanks
For a good team 4 team group may in theory make the probabilty of finishing as group winner higher, since it means more matches, therefor less variance.
ReplyDeleteIn practice the 4th team is not weak enough so it will almost always be better to be in a 3 team group.