FIFA will publish the ranking on 19 October.
Spain's top spot in danger, but Netherlands need results to go their way to return to the top.
Probable results computed using the Elo Ratings. See the list of results used for this ranking.
Suriname, Zambia, Ecuador, St. Kitts and Nevis and St. Vincent and the Grenadines (difficult to make a list when these two are involved) expected to climb 15 or more places.
Bolivia, Cyprus, Montenegro, New Zealand, US Virgin Islands and Finland expected to drop 15 or more places.
Probable October 2011 rank - Team - Probable October 2011 points - +/- Ranking - +/- Points
1 | Spain | 1624 | 0 | 19 |
2 | Netherlands | 1557 | 0 | -14 |
3 | Germany | 1352 | 0 | 62 |
4 | Uruguay | 1230 | 0 | 46 |
5 | England | 1210 | 3 | 121 |
6 | Italy | 1135 | 0 | -7 |
7 | Brazil | 1122 | 0 | -10 |
8 | Portugal | 1094 | -3 | -64 |
9 | Argentina | 1088 | 1 | 64 |
10 | Croatia | 1062 | -1 | 5 |
11 | France | 1027 | 1 | 71 |
12 | Switzerland | 1023 | 6 | 137 |
13 | Russia | 975 | 0 | 21 |
14 | Greece | 957 | -3 | -43 |
15 | Chile | 941 | -1 | 9 |
16 | Denmark | 922 | 1 | 29 |
17 | Japan | 911 | -2 | -13 |
18 | Côte d'Ivoire | 900 | -2 | -10 |
19 | Serbia | 892 | 2 | 37 |
20 | Mexico | 869 | 0 | 3 |
21 | Australia | 867 | -2 | -15 |
22 | Norway | 839 | 1 | 4 |
23 | Bosnia-Herzegovina | 821 | -1 | -18 |
24 | Sweden | 820 | 1 | 28 |
25 | Republic of Ireland | 812 | 4 | 63 |
26 | Paraguay | 808 | -2 | -17 |
27 | Turkey | 803 | 0 | 49 |
28 | Egypt | 775 | 8 | 62 |
29 | Korea Republic | 770 | 0 | 21 |
30 | Hungary | 765 | -3 | 11 |
31 | Colombia | 757 | 1 | 19 |
32 | Ghana | 734 | 5 | 34 |
33 | USA | 727 | -2 | -14 |
34 | Algeria | 713 | 12 | 108 |
35 | Peru | 688 | 0 | -36 |
36 | Slovenia | 687 | -3 | -45 |
37 | Nigeria | 683 | 6 | 70 |
38 | Romania | 680 | 11 | 96 |
39 | Belgium | 670 | -5 | -59 |
40 | Israel | 669 | -2 | -8 |
41 | South Africa | 666 | 10 | 92 |
42 | Iran | 644 | 8 | 68 |
43 | Cameroon | 634 | 5 | 38 |
44 | Slovakia | 629 | -5 | -33 |
45 | Senegal | 626 | -3 | 12 |
46 | Jamaica | 602 | -1 | -4 |
47 | Czech Republic | 600 | -7 | -56 |
48 | Montenegro | 586 | -22 | -191 |
49 | Scotland | 581 | 3 | 9 |
50 | Burkina Faso | 578 | -9 | -73 |
50 | Panama | 578 | 3 | 14 |
52 | Morocco | 567 | 7 | 33 |
53 | Ecuador | 559 | 16 | 78 |
54 | Venezuela | 557 | -7 | -41 |
55 | Bulgaria | 554 | 0 | -4 |
56 | Armenia | 542 | -12 | -68 |
56 | Honduras | 542 | -3 | -22 |
56 | Tunisia | 542 | 5 | 16 |
59 | Ukraine | 524 | 1 | -7 |
60 | Costa Rica | 522 | -3 | -27 |
61 | Mali | 518 | 1 | -1 |
62 | Belarus | 511 | -6 | -43 |
63 | China PR | 496 | 10 | 27 |
63 | Zimbabwe | 496 | 3 | 6 |
65 | Estonia | 495 | -7 | -42 |
66 | Zambia | 485 | 17 | 76 |
67 | Poland | 481 | -2 | -15 |
68 | Georgia | 475 | -4 | -24 |
69 | Gabon | 470 | -2 | -19 |
70 | Trinidad and Tobago | 466 | 10 | 52 |
71 | Libya | 462 | -9 | -57 |
72 | Sierra Leone | 455 | -4 | -33 |
73 | Canada | 453 | 14 | 58 |
73 | Northern Ireland | 453 | -3 | -24 |
75 | Latvia | 447 | -1 | -13 |
76 | Austria | 443 | 1 | 1 |
77 | Uzbekistan | 430 | 2 | 9 |
78 | Jordan | 428 | 7 | 22 |
79 | El Salvador | 427 | 9 | 37 |
80 | Albania | 424 | -9 | -50 |
81 | Malawi | 418 | -3 | -21 |
82 | Lithuania | 416 | -7 | -43 |
83 | Uganda | 411 | -1 | 0 |
84 | Guinea | 405 | -8 | -42 |
85 | Angola | 404 | -1 | -3 |
85 | Cape Verde Islands | 404 | 6 | 32 |
87 | FYR Macedonia | 400 | 7 | 34 |
88 | Finland | 394 | -16 | -77 |
89 | Botswana | 386 | 6 | 22 |
90 | Antigua and Barbuda | 381 | 12 | 36 |
90 | Qatar | 381 | 7 | 21 |
92 | Suriname | 364 | 21 | 78 |
93 | Syria | 362 | 8 | 15 |
94 | Kuwait | 359 | 6 | 7 |
94 | Togo | 359 | 1 | -5 |
96 | Niger | 352 | -3 | -17 |
97 | Wales | 346 | -7 | -28 |
98 | Saudi Arabia | 345 | 0 | -14 |
99 | Guatemala | 341 | 11 | 39 |
100 | Iraq | 340 | 9 | 37 |
101 | Benin | 335 | -9 | -35 |
102 | Cuba | 332 | 3 | 0 |
102 | Haiti | 332 | 6 | 27 |
104 | Guyana | 331 | 12 | 53 |
105 | Sudan | 327 | -2 | -11 |
106 | Bahrain | 324 | -2 | -11 |
107 | Oman | 317 | -1 | -2 |
107 | St. Kitts and Nevis | 317 | 16 | 65 |
109 | New Zealand | 310 | -20 | -67 |
110 | Iceland | 300 | -3 | -16 |
111 | Azerbaijan | 296 | -13 | -63 |
112 | Mozambique | 281 | 3 | 1 |
113 | Gambia | 280 | 11 | 32 |
114 | United Arab Emirates | 276 | -2 | -11 |
115 | Thailand | 275 | 2 | 1 |
116 | Bolivia | 273 | -35 | -139 |
117 | Korea DPR | 268 | 4 | 10 |
118 | Luxembourg | 263 | -4 | -21 |
119 | Cyprus | 259 | -33 | -139 |
120 | Faroe Islands | 257 | 5 | 13 |
121 | Grenada | 255 | -1 | -10 |
121 | Moldova | 255 | 1 | 0 |
123 | Central African Republic | 251 | -12 | -45 |
124 | Liechtenstein | 249 | -6 | -21 |
125 | Namibia | 248 | -6 | -21 |
126 | Tanzania | 232 | 0 | -8 |
127 | Congo DR | 223 | 1 | -2 |
128 | Vietnam | 222 | 1 | 13 |
129 | Liberia | 216 | -2 | -14 |
130 | Ethiopia | 213 | 2 | 17 |
131 | Belize | 197 | 2 | 2 |
132 | Kazakhstan | 196 | -1 | -2 |
133 | Kenya | 189 | -3 | -11 |
134 | Singapore | 185 | 2 | -3 |
135 | Barbados | 184 | 14 | 36 |
136 | Bangladesh | 183 | 2 | 0 |
136 | Burundi | 183 | 4 | 4 |
138 | Dominican Republic | 180 | -3 | -9 |
139 | Indonesia | 178 | 0 | -4 |
140 | Rwanda | 177 | 2 | -1 |
141 | Nepal | 176 | -7 | -17 |
142 | Turkmenistan | 172 | -2 | -7 |
143 | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 162 | 15 | 47 |
144 | Fiji | 158 | 2 | 0 |
144 | Yemen | 158 | -7 | -27 |
146 | Puerto Rico | 157 | -2 | -16 |
147 | Malaysia | 155 | -1 | -3 |
148 | Dominica | 151 | 0 | -3 |
149 | Lebanon | 146 | -4 | -17 |
150 | Congo | 144 | -7 | -33 |
151 | Bahamas | 141 | 0 | 0 |
152 | Equatorial Guinea | 139 | -1 | -2 |
152 | Hong Kong | 139 | 3 | 15 |
154 | Malta | 128 | -1 | -10 |
154 | New Caledonia | 128 | 0 | 0 |
156 | Philippines | 126 | 9 | 21 |
157 | Palestine | 121 | 4 | 13 |
158 | India | 115 | 4 | 9 |
158 | Nicaragua | 115 | -3 | -9 |
160 | Maldives | 114 | 5 | 9 |
161 | Tajikistan | 112 | -4 | -5 |
162 | Madagascar | 110 | -4 | -5 |
163 | Chinese Taipei | 108 | 9 | 19 |
164 | Guinea-Bissau | 106 | -2 | 0 |
164 | Lesotho | 106 | 3 | 2 |
164 | Mongolia | 106 | -2 | 0 |
167 | US Virgin Islands | 104 | -17 | -40 |
168 | Myanmar | 101 | 0 | 3 |
169 | Chad | 99 | -9 | -11 |
170 | Swaziland | 97 | -1 | 2 |
171 | Aruba | 92 | -1 | 0 |
172 | Pakistan | 91 | -2 | -1 |
173 | Vanuatu | 88 | 0 | 0 |
174 | Cambodia | 85 | 0 | 1 |
175 | Sri Lanka | 83 | 1 | 0 |
176 | Seychelles | 82 | 1 | 0 |
177 | Curacao | 76 | 1 | -3 |
178 | Solomon Islands | 75 | 1 | 0 |
179 | Laos | 74 | 3 | 3 |
180 | Tahiti | 73 | 4 | 5 |
181 | Comoros | 72 | -2 | -3 |
182 | Afghanistan | 69 | 1 | -1 |
183 | Bermuda | 67 | 6 | 37 |
184 | St. Lucia | 53 | 1 | 7 |
185 | Cayman Islands | 51 | -11 | -33 |
186 | Kyrgyzstan | 49 | -7 | -26 |
187 | Guam | 36 | -1 | 0 |
188 | Papua New Guinea | 34 | -1 | 0 |
189 | Mauritius | 32 | -1 | -1 |
190 | Eritrea | 28 | 0 | 0 |
191 | Macau | 25 | 0 | 0 |
192 | British Virgin Islands | 23 | -1 | -2 |
192 | Somalia | 23 | 1 | 0 |
194 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 13 | 1 | 0 |
195 | Djibouti | 12 | 1 | 0 |
196 | Cook Islands | 10 | 1 | 0 |
197 | Anguilla | 9 | 1 | 0 |
197 | Brunei Darussalam | 9 | 1 | 0 |
199 | Bhutan | 6 | 1 | 0 |
200 | Mauritania | 4 | -7 | -19 |
201 | Timor-Leste | 3 | 0 | 0 |
201 | Tonga | 3 | 0 | 0 |
203 | American Samoa | 0 | 0 | 0 |
203 | Andorra | 0 | 0 | 0 |
203 | Montserrat | 0 | 0 | 0 |
203 | Samoa | 0 | 0 | 0 |
203 | San Marino | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Edgar, can you do such a preview for the UEFA ranking? Or do you know another site that does?
ReplyDeleteI'm interested in the seeding for the EURO 2012 playoffs.
Great site, btw.
@paqs: it seems to me that is a bit more difficult, because the UEFA rankings doesn't look at the result of a game alone. It also considers the number of goals scored and the goal difference.
ReplyDeleteThe FIFA rankings only need to know who wins the game to decide the points.
Right .. but ELO generates results, doesn't it?
ReplyDelete@paqs
ReplyDeleteMost of the non-draws are 1 - 0 results, so that doesn't help.
I will look into this next Friday - time allowing...
A long term idea.
ReplyDeleteVoros converted his rankings to an expected goals for either team, then did simulations based on the Poisson distribution to come up with his winning chances.
Given that ELO computes an expected winning percentage, one could run this process in reverse; go from the winning percentage and find out what amount of expected goals would give rise to that percentage of wins.
Then you could run the model forward again, giving a percentage chance of each result (and thus also the most likely result to occur.)
This is rather heavy statistics but I'd find it fun to do :)
121 points for beating Montenegro. Nice. Without Zlatko, and with them needing to beat England to have a chance of winning the group so being unable to sit in their defensive formation as they did at Wembley, England can win this. 1046pts for a loss. Anyone know what England would have for a draw? Big differences here.
ReplyDelete@Lorric
ReplyDeleteThey'll sit back, 2nd place is what they're aiming for. Haven't seen anything in the Montenegrin press about catching up Englad since the draw with Bulgaria, it's all about Switzerland for them.
And their defense isn't as strong as it used to be. Especially their goalkeeper seems to have lost his form - a year ago he seemed like the best goalkeeper in the world :)
@Lorric and win/loss/draw
ReplyDeleteIf England win they get 1210
If England lose they get 1046
A draw is 1/3 of a win as long as you play the same opponent
Thus England get 164/3 = 55 extra points for a win
1046 + 55 = 1101.
@ MV
ReplyDeleteA draw would be an interesting result. Ah, the prospect of England being ripped apart in the press for taking a result which qualifies the national team to Euro 2012 at the head of their qualifying group... *facepalm*
I'd be content with a draw, but seeing the points on offer I want a win. More importantly, it would also be useful for securing England's place in Pot B in the Euro Coefficient for the Euro 2012 draw, and it would also lay down a marker for World Cup qualifying as Montenegro are in our group again.
@ Hakon
ReplyDeleteThanks. I should have thought of that since I knew the gap between a win and a loss.
@Hakon, I think your calculation is wrong. The points won in the match against Montenegro go in the overall pts in the last year, and are then average. So it's not that straightforward.
ReplyDelete@ MV
ReplyDeleteYou know I was thinking that too, but I didn't know whether it would work like that or not. Now Hakon said it I went with him, but now I think you're probably right. Ah, the complexities of the FIFA Ranking...
Edgar... help! :)
@MV
ReplyDeleteYes, it is that straightforward. Work it out for yourself slowly if you want, you'll get the same result.
It's a consequence of the fact that you can split up a fraction (the average over the last 12 months) into its constituent parts (points from match 1/number of matches + points from match 2/number of matches ...) So as long as you know what 3 points from match n / number of matches is, you can divide that by three to get the points for a draw.
Yep, sorry. I actually do the same thing myself all the time. :D Just did it for Croatia's rivals.
ReplyDeleteSomehow I've read your post wrong. I actually thought you've calculated a draw being worth 2/3 of a win, too.
I've been posting too many comments here today. :D
Sorry again.
Regarding lists:
ReplyDeletehttp://thegloss.com/beauty/why-the-oxford-comma-is-something-you-should-care-about-392/
It should be "Suriname, Zambia, Ecuador, St. Kitts and Nevis, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines..."
:)
I'm guessing this is based on Wales losing to both Switzerland and Bulgaria.
ReplyDeleteWe'll rip Bulgaria a new one. The Swiss game will be close though.
@ Stuart
ReplyDeleteYes, Wales are predicted to lose to them both. Why so confident about Bulgaria? They already beat you at home. What makes you think you'll "rip Bulgaria a new one" on their own soil?
It's interesting that Turkey get 49 points for a defeat against Germany (?) and a win against Azerbaijan (97th on FIFA ranking list) while Hungary only get 11 (!!) for a win against Finland (72nd on the same list), don't you think? Or have I misunderstood something?
ReplyDeleteDönci,
ReplyDeleteThe ranking-points are calculated over all matches played in the last four years. For each match played a team gets 'match-points'. Each year the match-points are worth less and less, due to an applied weighting.
Each year-timeframe has a weight: last year (months 1-12) counts for 1, the next year-timeframe (months 13-24) for 0.5, the next year-timeframe (months 25-36) for 0.3 and the fourth year-timeframe (months 37-48) counts for 0.2.
So when the coming october-ranking is calculated a team loses ranking-points for matches played in september 2010, september 2009 and september 2008 because the match-points are multiplied with a lesser weight.
So it's not only about the gained points in the matches played in the current month, but also about these "lost points" due to so-called devaluation of match-points. The difference between the gained points and the lost points decides whether a team gains or loses ranking points (compared to the september-ranking) and thus climbs or descends in the new october-ranking.
Hope this sheds some light on the whole business.
Look at http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/fifafacts/r&a-wr/52/00/97/fs-590_10e_wrpoints.pdf if you want to know all the details.
Oh okay, I always forget about that. Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience... :)
ReplyDelete@Lorric.
ReplyDeleteWhen we played Bulgaria at home we'd just sacked Toshack and brought Flynn in as caretaker.
Flynn opted to leave Bellamy out so he could play for Cardiff (he was on loan FFS!) and play Ashley Williams in DM despite having decent players on the bench that could do that role. Probably just so he bring the woeful Danny Collins out of exile to partner the over the hill and mistake prone James Collins.
He did better against the Swiss in the next match and the 4-1 scoreline really flattered them. Until the last 10 minutes it was still anyones game. A better ref would have seen them down to 10 men after Bale was elbowed in the face. Or at least offered him some form of protection.
The team we have right now that battered Montenegro until Ramsey was taken off and should have beaten England will be completely different in terms of style and approach to the one that timidly lost 0-1 to them last year.
I'd settle for a decent performance against the Swiss and a win against Bulgaria but there's no reason we cant beat them both.
@Håkon
ReplyDeleteI'm extremely short on time for the blog. I do have a family (with three kids) and a job. Of course, it would be ideal for me to be paid for doing statistics/writing on my blog - but until that happens (and I'm not holding my breath for it) I still have changes to implement, bugs to fix, deadlines to respect etc.
@ERic Will try to brush up on my English grammar then :)
@Ed Thanks for the help!